Archive

But I Just Gave You That Information!

Abhijit BardeIt happens all the time.

I call a customer service line, navigate through a series of menus, provide all the relevant information – all along a comforting voice assuring me that I will be “connected to right specialist” – and when I finally reach an agent, I have to answer the same questions all over again.

It is frustrating.

It is waste of time for everyone.

A well integrated voice system that can deliver a “well-primed” caller to the agent can shave off 2-5 minutes of precious agent talk time – thus improving agent productivity.

But the real benefit is improved caller satisfaction and reduced aggravation as a result of not having to repeat the same answers to a live agent.

Organizations strike a balance between agent staffing levels and customer satisfaction by rolling out rich, data-aware voice applications to pre-screen and prepare the calls that are then delivered to agents.

However, the infrastructure complexities and costs involved in implementing such utopian ideas can alienate most organizations.

Come to think of it, in today’s world of instant messaging, on demand audio/video downloads, ubiquitous wireless hotspots, why do we still have antiquated telephone systems that can’t transfer phone data to an agent’s desktop?

That’s all there is to it.  Really!

So where does the data get lost? The underlying problem lies with the fact that we can’t attach data to a telephone call itself.  It has to be sent via a separate network (usually IP) and the data and the call needs to be synchronized to reach the right agent at the right time.

Today, CTI (Computer Telephony Integration) solutions perform the magic of providing transport of call data to agent’s desktop.  Most CTI solutions in the market are proprietary and can get expensive if the enterprise has multiple call centers with disparate systems from multiple vendors.

This gets further complicated if the calls are outsourced to an offshore location. However, a few technologies are reducing the cost and infrastructure barriers to implement a CTI solution. These systems use clever techniques to hold the call state in the network throughout the duration of the call — irrespective of where is call is terminating (local call centers or offshore centers). This allows associated call data to be stored centrally and can be accessed from any web browser.

On top of that, this kind of network architecture requires zero infrastructure investments at premise level.Things look brighter on the horizon as well. With SIP-VoIP along with SIP call control extensions (such as ECMA TR/87) tomorrow’s telephony system will be able interoperate more easily on open standards.

Using SIP, it will be much easier to associate call information to the call which stays with the call as the call gets forwarded to various SIP endpoints. After the underlying CTI plumbing is taken care of, this kind of architecture open a door to a whole suite of cool features that can be implemented cost effectively.

Typically, if you talk to any one who has worked on CTI implementation, more likely the person will talk in terms of key-value pairs. That’s the extent of information richness of the traditional CTI applications. Some of the sophisticated CTI solutions that can be implemented are:

Call Analytics: Imagine agent getting a screen-pop with a brief snapshot of how has the caller navigated during the automated call. Agents at a glance can figure out what options the caller has chosen in the speech app, how long he has been on hold, reason for calling.

Caller Analytics: While the call analytics provides rich information about the current call, the caller information can be tied to CRM systems like salesforce.com or Oracle to figure outhow often this caller has contacted the company, reasons for calling, customer preferences, and customer life cycle stage.  Based on this information, agent can then provide personalized service to the caller.The possibilities are endless.

Once the CTI infrastructure hurdles are overcome, it takes little effort for companies to improve customer satisfaction and make sure I never have to say “But I just gave you that information!

Thank You Steve Jobs & The Apple Team!

We were thrilled to hear that Steve Jobs was reviewing the prompts for the iPhone voice system – what a testament to branding and concern about the customer experience! The idea here is simple: help the caller get to the right company when they need help – either AppleCare or AT&T.

Thank You Steve Jobs & The Apple Team!

Thank You Steve Jobs & The Apple Team!

We wish the best to Apple with the iPhone launch.

-The TuVox Team

Branding 101 – Don’t forget the phone channel

Laura

The Oft Forgotten Phone Channel

Try this: go to any shopping mall and take a good look around. Look at the storefronts, the carefully arranged displays, the beautiful people hawking perfumes. A visual feast of delights to assault your senses and make you a true believer… in the brand.

Then call the 800 numbers for these same companies and that’s usually when the needle scratches off the record.

Companies obsess over maximizing the value of every customer touch point and yet, most of them miss the opportunity to engage their customers on a brand level through the phone channel. I would go one step further and say a large portion of these companies have 800 numbers that actual repel customers. The Website Touchtone Hell chronicles some of the most repellent 800 numbers around.

According to a recent article by the Service & Support Professionals Association (SSPA), more than half of support issues are initiated by phone. So, it’s hard to believe companies would intentionally ignore the phone channel. And yet, most callers are still tortured by long hold times, confusing touch-tone menus and repeatedly told to visit a company’s website.

But alas, a glimmer of hope: A handful of companies have figured it out. Companies like American Airlines, Apple and USAA are actually extending their brands through the phone channel with personalized and often proactive service. For example, with the American Airlines ‘Know Me’ program (see my June 21st comment), the company knows who the caller is and why they’re calling, before they ever speak a word.

In a world where touch-tone hell is still the norm, it’s refreshing when you actually do business with a company that has customer service continuity, whether that service is provided at the ticket counter, on the jet way, or by phone. There are a ton of retail and other companies who would do well to follow the American Airlines lead and invest as much in telephone self-service as they do on storefronts.

“Welcome Back, Steve,” said the friendly…computer??!

Steve Pollock

Personalization Arrives in the Voice Channel

It’s amazing how quickly you get used to personalized customer service. Most merchants and companies I do business with have a personalized web experience. On Amazon, Netflix, eBay I’m greeted by name. My recommendations are highly tailored and my account information is readily accessible.

I’ve been waiting for this for years on the phone, and it’s finally happened.

I was just greeted by name when I called American Airlines. It’s about time!

American has just deployed a really amazing new system that has some really cool features. My favorite is one of the simplest — I can opt-in so my cell phone is recognized, so I’m immediately identified and authenticated.

“Thanks for calling American Airlines. Welcome back, Steve.” It’s very cool. Better yet, I get proactive service — when I’ve got a flight coming up, I automatically get flight status. When I land, I’m offered help with lost baggage. If I need to be rebooked, it is handled automatically. The most common options are menu-free — they’re proactively offered.

The phone has taken a huge step forward.

Are you an American frequent flyer? Try it! You can get information on the American Airlines website.

TuVox built this system using multiple personalization techniques. A series of dynamic features are used to create a highly personalized experience. Some of the personalization features include greeting by name and context-specific menus — so that I’m only offered appropriate choices at any point.

The other key element of a next-generation personalized experience is what we refer to as ‘anticipating intent’. The American application looks at your current status to see if you’re flying; if you’re between legs of a trip; if you’ve just landed; if you’ve got an upcoming return flight, etc. On top of your status is event-based information — are planes late, have you been re-booked. The combination of these may result in a high probability reason for a phone call.

Anticipating intent allows American to offer service without having to present a menu selection. This is very forward-thinking and breaks significant new ground for a phone system.

This is the phone system of the future, here today.

Tell Me Again: Why Do I Need VoIP?

Abhijit BardeRecently, I was helping out on a project for one of our customers. The customer had on-premise IVRs at multiple call centers with multiple phone numbers from multiple carriers landing at each site.

The customer wanted a CTI-integrated, fully-redundant hosted speech solution to automate just a part of the call flow, with the existing call flows still being serviced by the respective IVRs.

And… all of this in the TDM world!!!

The sheer complexity of the solution boggles the mind. We were discussing crisscrossing tie-lines, bridging calls back-and-forth, with CTI servers at multiple locations. It was just too complicated. Of course, we figured it out, but it’s a very complex solution.

I was fantasizing how much easier things would have been if the IT group was open to (and had justified budget for) a VoIP based solution. Nowadays, even though most IT groups have some plans to roll out VoIP based solutions, many don’t have a comprehensive plan to migrate contact center infrastructure.

An all-IP solution for contact centers comes with the promise of universal routing, pre-treatment of calls, centralized voice portals, reduced infrastructure costs. Imagine not having to deal with terminating circuits, “take back and transfer” costs and expensive CTI infrastructure.

The key thing to remember is that companies must have an enterprise-wide vision to rollout the all-IP solution. In my experience, most companies start-off with a pilot projects with specific purpose and then future projects become dependent on the choices made previously. I have seen VoIP plans getting quickly derailed due to inability of legacy hardware to be upgraded or due to interoperability of the hardware/software choices from various vendors.

To start out on the right foot, it is crucial to align with the right IP open standards at the enterprise level. This will pave the path to the future possibilities via interoperability of newer applications. SIP has been becoming a dominant standard in the VoIP market place. Its popularity can be attributed to lower complexity, higher extensibility and better scalability.

Continue reading ‘Tell Me Again: Why Do I Need VoIP?’

The Call Center Agents Are Not Hiding From You

Nick Ezzo

Just this morning, I read an entry on the Customer Service Blog “Customers Are Always” that made a pretty bold claim about having a live customer service answer the phone on the first ring.

Normally, I agree with Maria Palma, and I heartily applaud her for carrying the banner for improving customer service.

However, in this case, I couldn’t disagree more. Here is the quote:

Is it possible to have a live agent answer the call on the first ring? You’re darn right it’s possible!

It is neither possible nor practical to answer every call with a live agent. The reason is simple: Call Volumes.

Just ask 1-800-Flowers.com how many calls they take on February 14th. Or, ask Apple how many iPod calls they receive on the day after Christmas.

In order to have a live agent answer the call on the first ring you would need to have hundreds or thousands of call center agents waiting for calls to come in on that single day. And when no agent is available, what do you get? Music on hold.

If done correctly, automation can (1) handle unpredictable and uneven call volumes and (2) make your existing call center agents more productive. When your customers’ needs are handled quickly and efficiently, they will thank you and they will become repeat customers.

5 Best Practices to Make Your Knowledge-Base “Talk”

StevePutting a Voice to your Key Support Knowledge
We need to acknowledge that there are two clear classes of callers. First, the web-oriented callers who have already tried all our web resources, were unable to solve their problem, and are now on the phone. Those callers need to be directed to an agent and encouraged to continue to use self help.

Second, are callers who have not used the web – either it’s not convenient (they’re mobile) or they just didn’t bother. In any case, BOTH know there’s a website. Just telling them there’s a support website is a waste of their time and precious telecom costs.

That’s a shame, when it’s relatively easy to help callers with knowledgebase content right on the phone. Or, just a way to guide callers to specific information online – not general message, but a specific page that will help.

The question is:
Why aren’t companies making this information available over the phone?

If you’re in charge of providing telephone-based support at your company, I have to ask — are you leveraging this information across all customer interaction channels, including Web self-service and voice self-service?

The reality is that some customers will use Web support and some won’t. In many cases, customers have tried Web support, but couldn’t easily find a solution.

Others might not have tried Web support at all — some customers are unable (not near a computer, technologically challenged, etc.) and a few are unwilling — they would prefer to speak with a live customer service representative at any cost.

For these reasons, your technical support line continues to ring (and ring). And every call handled by a live agent is costly, cutting into ever-narrowing profit margins.

When customers have reviewed all your Web articles, and are willing to wait any length of time, it is difficult to decrease the business impact of these calls.

For all other callers, however, using voice automation to access your knowledgebase can save up to 90% per call.

To successfully automate a large percentage of routine technical support calls, there are five key best practices to keep in mind.

Download the rest of the article here.

5 Best Practices to Make Your Knowledgebase “Talk”

It’s All About The Caller Experience.

Nick Ezzo

Secrets In Providing Superior Caller Experience

Not too long ago, I picked up a Gartner report on IVR and speech recognition that had some pretty amazing findings.

Not surprisingly, when customers have problems, they immediately reach for the phone (versus going to a website and trying to dig for an answer). But you already knew that.

Much more interesting, though — if wait times are more than two minutes, callers strongly prefer using speech-enabled IVR applications rather than waiting for a representative.

So it seems that speech-enabled IVR systems have found their killer app(s) — the stuff that touchtone systems can’t do, or that normally require agent assistance. Except, um, there aren’t any agents available.

Obvious candidates for speech recognition are things like address change, step-by-step troubleshooting, and open-ended call routing.

Unfortunately, not all speech-enabled IVR applications are created equal. Some are highly frustrating, causing the caller to unnecessarily repeat information or to wade through endless menus before arriving at a place where self-service can finally begin.

So here are a few tips on creating a great caller experience:

1. Make it Conversational

The bottom line is this — in order for speech-enabled systems to deliver a superior caller experience, they must be conversational. That means: let callers ask for what they need, understand their questions and quickly resolve their issues. Oh, and by the way, do it faster than a live agent.

2. Give Control (no, really)

Callers also want to feel in control of the process (I know I do). Every caller should be able to give commands such as wait, go back, next, or (most importantly) live agent!!! at any time. Otherwise, the system is just as bad as the “voice mail jail” systems that are being replaced.

3. Be Different

For competitive reasons, it seems that every company wants to offer differentiated service to their customers. Next generation IVR systems identify certain customers and handle calls according to business logic.

Here’s a great example — understand that an airline passenger is in the middle of a trip, and offer their next flight information proactively. If you haven’t tried it, call the American Airlines “Know Me” application sometime. You will be truly impressed, trust me.

4. Do Your Agents A Favor

Finally, If a caller needs to speak with a live agent, the interaction has got to be productive. The agent should already have access to all the information the caller has provided to the IVR. Nothing is more annoying to a caller than inputting all account information into the system and, after failing to resolve the issue, being routed to an agent who asks for the same information all over again.

Download the rest of the article here.

5 Best Practices In Providing Superior Caller Experience With Speech

Solving the Touch-tone Problem

Laura

Every now and then, I get to work on really great speech-enabled IVR systems, that even callers like to use. Recently, I learned from Telecom New Zealand, the major telephone carrier in a country of about 4 million people, that their callers really like their new system.

Today, Telecom New Zealand provides millions of subscribers with local dial tone, plus long distance service, plus Internet service, plus mobile services, plus a variety of other value-added services.

So it stands to reason, their subscribers are calling for a myriad of product offerings and for a multitude of reasons.

After adding more and more items to their touch-tone system, they started to get the feeling that their touch-tone menu system just wasn’t cutting it anymore.

So, how did they handle this problem? They implemented a conversational call routing speech system. The results were really stunning:

  • The number of callers that “zero out” dropped to almost nothing
  • Customer satisfaction with speech is three times greater than with the old touch-tone IVR
  • Huge jump in CSR efficiency due to reduced re-work and misroutes

Here is an interesting article that appeared on Destination CRM, entitled Chatting Up Customers Down Under.